Securing The Unmanned Revolution.

Securing The Unmanned Revolution.

Quantum Encryption and Counter-Jamming For Unmanned Autonomous Systems.

Quantum Encryption and Counter-Jamming For Unmanned Autonomous Systems.

DQSP vs AES 256

LIVEClean spectrumSEQ 0001T+00:00
Lineage
Standby
Jamming
Link history
GCSGround station
UAVAircraft
Adversary interceptCommands exposed
listening
Command deliveryrolling · last 24
Lineage—
AES-PSK / GCM—
ECDH + GCM—
ML-KEM + GCM—

Session protocols cannot complete a handshake through jamming. Lineage keys every message on its own, so there is no handshake to break.

GCS-01 · FIELD TERMINALNOMINAL

0%

0%

COMMS COST REDUCTION

0%

0%

DELIVERY UNDER EW

0ms

0ms

MINIMAL LATENCY

0Kbit

0Kbit

BANDWIDTH OVERHEAD

Built for Modern Warfare.

Built for Modern Warfare.

Keep command authority through jamming, packet loss and capture, across every domain, from one drop-in layer. No sessions to kill. No handshakes to break.

Keep command authority through jamming, packet loss and capture, across every domain, from one drop-in layer. No sessions to kill. No handshakes to break.

Anti-Jam Link Reconstruction

Reconstructs commands through jamming, packet loss and bit corruption. Other protocols discard the message. Lineage keeps delivering.

Icon

Post Quantum Encrypted

Post-quantum secure by design and resistant to harvest-now, decrypt-later attacks. No retrofit when allied PQC deadlines hit starting 2028.

Icon

Compromise Containment

Each platform carries its own isolated key material. Capture a drone and you learn nothing about the rest of the fleet.

Icon

Per-Message Authentication

Track exposed assets, leaked credentials, and emerging security risks.

Icon

Drop-In Integration

Platform-agnostic and format-agnostic. MAVLink, STANAG 4586, CRSF, raw video. Deploys on existing radios and flight controllers with no firmware changes.

Specifications

Size

55 x 35 mm

Weight

12.7 grams

Power draw

5V/1A

Protocol

Agnostic

Lead time

≤ 2 Weeks

Regions

UK · EU · US

Compliance

CNSA2.0, ANSII, NDAA

From Integration to Scale in Three

1. Integrate

2. Test & Optimise

3. Scale

01

Connect Your Stack

02

Test at edge

03

Production & Scale

Lineage, Compliant by design

Achieve Procurement Compliance, with security and compliance embedded at every layer to protect sensitive critical intelligence.

CNSA 2.0

ANSSI

NDAA Compliant

AES 256 vs DQSP

AES encrypts data. DQSP is designed to protect and maintain the command link when the operating environment becomes hostile.

Case

Conventional AES-based link

DQSP

Command delivery under jamming

Lost or corrupted packets are typically discarded; the link may need to recover

Designed to reconstruct valid command data and continue delivery through packet loss and corruption

Recovery after disruption

Often relies on session state and re-establishing a connection

Re-synchronises without a handshake

Protection from spoofed commands

Depends on the wider implementation and key management

Each command is independently authenticated using single-use key material

If a platform is captured

Recovered keys or session data can expose more communications

Compromise is contained: exposure is limited to the affected message and platform

Bandwidth overhead

Encryption tags, nonces and session traffic consume constrained C2 bandwidth

Lightweight 8-byte overhead per protected packet

Integration

May require changes to the radio security stack or platform architecture

Sits inline between the radio and flight controller, preserving existing operator workflows

Radio choice

Secure capability can be tied to costly, proprietary radio systems

Works across the existing radio bearer, giving OEMs greater supply-chain and cost flexibility

Future-proofing

AES remains important, but conventional session and key-exchange designs may require future upgrades

Built for long-term protection without reliance on conventional session establishment

Command delivery under jamming

AES-based link

Lost or corrupted packets are typically discarded; the link may need to recover

DQSP

Designed to reconstruct valid command data and continue delivery through packet loss and corruption

Recovery after disruption

AES-based link

Often relies on session state and re-establishing a connection

DQSP

Re-synchronises without a handshake

Protection from spoofed commands

AES-based link

Depends on the wider implementation and key management

DQSP

Each command is independently authenticated using single-use key material

If a platform is captured

AES-based link

Recovered keys or session data can expose more communications

DQSP

Compromise is contained: exposure is limited to the affected message and platform

Bandwidth overhead

AES-based link

Encryption tags, nonces and session traffic consume constrained C2 bandwidth

DQSP

Lightweight 8-byte overhead per protected packet

Integration

AES-based link

May require changes to the radio security stack or platform architecture

DQSP

Sits inline between the radio and flight controller, preserving existing operator workflows

Radio choice

AES-based link

Secure capability can be tied to costly, proprietary radio systems

DQSP

Works across the existing radio bearer, giving OEMs greater supply-chain and cost flexibility

Future-proofing

AES-based link

AES remains important, but conventional session and key-exchange designs may require future upgrades

DQSP

Built for long-term protection without reliance on conventional session establishment

Read more

BLOG

Insights for builders and
modern teams

Insights, ideas, and news on frontier defence technology.

Discover all Articles

Blog Banner

The Datalink Is Part of the Attack Surface

Sep 28, 2026

Blog Banner

CNSA 2.0 and the Quantum Deadline Facing Drone Manufacturers

The transition to post-quantum security is no longer something defence manufacturers can leave for the future.

Sep 6, 2026

Blog Banner

Delatr Partners with SPRTK to Bring Post-Quantum UAV Communications to Critical Civil Applications

Aug 28, 2026